Read

Search form

Calling MayDay on Democracy, Super PAC Powered By Citizens Vows to #GetMoneyOut

Calling MayDay on Democracy, Super PAC Powered By Citizens Vows to #GetMoneyOut
Fri, 6/20/2014 - by Eleanor Goldfield

Super PACs spent $567,498,628 on the 2012 elections. About half of that was used on the presidential election. You may have seen that half-billion-dollar number thrown around or heard the mention of Super PACs – but what does a Super PAC really do?

In short, it's an organization that can raise an infinite mound of cash for federal elections. While they can't directly donate to a candidate or campaign, Super PACs use the money they raise to "advocate" for those candidates and campaigns. Advocacy typically takes the form of TV and video ads: streaming half a billion dollars worth of unchecked facts, ideological fanaticism and mud slinging through our living rooms, hearts and minds.

"So what," you say? Mudslinging has always been a part of the electoral process.

Yes, but it's a different kind of mud bath now. First of all, there's no regulation on the content that Super PACs put out. These organizations have been blasted more than a few times for creating ad campaigns beyond just your average, “Don't vote for this guy” schtick. Simply google "Super PACs accused of lying" and 16 million results will fall in your lap.

Second, and perhaps most importantly, the crisis of a U.S. electoral system dictated by Super PACs is a big deal because there's no such thing as a free lunch – especially when the 1% is your meal ticket.

USA Today analysis showed that as of February of 2012, 25% of Super PAC money being funneled into the presidential election came from five donors.

Five individuals. Just five. Now couple that with the fact that in 2010, 94% of winning candidates outspent their opponents. Like any legitimate business, those 94% have to pay those five people back somehow, right? And Americans are wondering why the average citizen gets about as much consideration from elected officials in DC as a meat lovers pizza would at a vegan potluck.

The Time Has Come Time To End Elections As Auctions

The correlation between wealthy corporate donors and this country's devolution into the abyss of income inequality, privatized healthcare and schools, endless war, the destruction of our environment and more, is no accident. Under the current system, whoever has the most money gets the most airplay gets the most votes gets the most political return on their investments. As most voters are aware, politicians don't run for public service but for private interest, knowing that on the other side of election lies a well-oiled revolving door of corporate lobbying jobs.

Yet in the midst of this corrupt circus, one Super PAC has sprouted from the grassroots, intent on pushing the will of the people back to where it belongs – into politics, in our Republic.

On May 1, Harvard Law School professor and renowned activist Lawrence Lessig launched a campaign entitled the MayDay PAC. Deriving its name from the well known distress signal and “moral obligation” of any captain who hears the call to help, MayDay PAC is both the call and the response:

It is the call from a democracy in distress – a call to its people to save it from the clutches of monied interests. And through donations on its site, it is the response of the people, for the people and by the people, to help.

“Our democracy is held hostage by the funders of campaigns,” Lessig explains. “We're going to pay the ransom and get it back. We want to build a Super PAC big enough to end all Super PACs and over the course of the next two elections use that Super PAC to win enough seats to pass fundamental reform.”

The group's plan is to secure $12 million for the 2014 election cycle, funneling 100% of donations into “professional campaigners, who will craft interventions in targeted districts to make fundamental reform the issue in that campaign — and to make the reform candidate the winner,” says Lessig.

And from there, MayDay PAC will “put Congress on notice that in 2016, we'll be back.”

Somehow $12 million doesn't sound like a lot when put against the backdrop of $250 million flowing through our Congress like an insatiable green snake with an appetite for corruption. And yet, when you think of a crowd-funded project, it suddenly sounds like an almost impossibly large sum of money.

Lessig is conscious of these obstacles, and they don't irk him. His answer: do it in stages. The MayDay PAC has already gotten through its first phase of funding – the initial target was $1 million, and if reached, Lessig pledged to match that same amount. In two weeks roughly 13,000 people pledged to support the PAC and MayDay reached its goal. $2 million – done.

The overflow, in fact, spilled into the next round which is aiming for the $5 million mark. As of this reporting, $792,000 has been raised, with under three weeks to go. Not by accident, the final round of funding ends July 4.

What happens if MayDay PAC doesn't reach its goal? As the site confirms, you can either pledge to donate regardless of whether the goal is reached, or pledge dependent on the goal being reached. Furthermore, Lessig and MayDay make it clear that this is an experiment: “to see if we, the people can kickstart a super PAC big enough to mobilize the people to demand reform.”

But MayDay PAC isn't just sitting back and watching the money roll in. From Lessig's video introduction of the group, to the in-depth discussion of its specific goals, MayDay PAC presents a clear, active and explicit campaign designed to inspire and engage.

The first step is to take on Congress. MayDay PAC will go after any Congressional candidate who isn't on board with campaign finance reform, regardless of where s/he stands on other issues. Think of it this way: any other issue you care about can be traced back to the corrupting influence of money in politics. That's why some are calling this a First Issue Movement: because before we can address our many and varied concerns, from climate change and health care to education, agriculture or prisons, we must first uncover the layer of corruption that is suffocating the political process.

MayDay seeks to strip that cover using five specific proposals. On the site Reform.to the group Rootstrikers (also founded by Lessig) has outlined five statutory proposals blending left and right campaign finance reform plans – including the names of people who have “sponsored” or committed to each proposal.

While Lessig has lent his name to several campaigns dealing with Constitutional reform, MayDay PAC sets statutory reform as the necessary first step – securing a majority to push for more sweeping, far reaching reform. “But that change is next on the list,” the site reports, adding, “the work of the Mayday PAC will not be finished until we have secured constitutional reform.”

Our money in to #GetMoneyOut. Ironic? Yeah, maybe. “But embrace the irony,” Lessig says. “Because with enough of us, we can easily build a Super PAC bigger and more effective than the Super PACs of the billionaires.

"If we can pull together a large enough pool of money through this campaign, we can convince Americans that they can change the way money matters in politics. We can create a system in which it isn’t the influence of a few that matters. Instead, as any democracy should, it would be the influence of a majority that matters.”

Just like we saw in California last week, citizens can use the system to beat the system. Put another way: the power of the people is greater than the people in power, and if we come together to fight corruption, we will win.

If you can donate, the current push goes until July 4 – with amounts ranging from $5 to $10,000. If you can't donate, spread the word. Send people to the site, post about it, tweet it and email it – particularly to those who say there's nothing that can be done about the status quo.

If all it took was a majority of Americans giving $5 to a campaign like this, to change our future trajectory from abyss to horizon, to shift the bad news to good, that's incredible. And wildly inspiring.

 

Sign Up

Article Tabs

Paris climate accord, COP21, carbon emissions, 2 degrees C, emissions reductions, renewable energy transition, renewable energy investments, clean energy investments, solar power, wind power, fossil fuel divestment

Changing the way the world is powered means big spending – and huge investment opportunities – with energy finance models suggesting clean power investments need to rise by an additional 75 percent, to $12.1 trillion, in the next 25 years.

Chinese monetary policy, Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, Chinese currency, Chinese currency manipulation, Special Drawing Rights, rising dollar

If war and hostilities between the great powers are to be avoided, the future of global capitalism may well rely on a combination of Western markets and institutions backed up by totalitarian institutions like the regime in Beijing.

Few police shootings of Latinos make national headlines – a lack of attention and outrage that stems from a poor understanding of the history of state violence against them in the U.S.

U.K. housing prices, soaring home prices, soaring rent costs, Eviction Resistance, housing bubble mortgage-backed securities, Great Recession, rising homelessness

Housing prices in London have risen by 50% in the last five years – and when the UK property bubble goes boom, it will be proportionally bigger than the U.S. housing bust at the onset of the financial crisis in 2007.

Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, TTIP, corporate trade deals, Investment Court System, German Magistrates Association, Investor State Dispute Settlement, ISDS, Global Justice Now

The German Magistrates Association (DRB) last week dealt a major blow to the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, as judges said special courts allowing firms to sue countries were unnecessary and "had no legal basis."

This week we passed the five-year anniversary of Tahrir Square, but do we even know – or care – what's happening there now, and do we see the parallels with what's going on right here? We speak with an Egyptian activist who sets the record straight.

Posted 6 days 13 hours ago

The media, which came to the story so late, can only process so much – but if you live in Flint or the State of Michigan as I do, you know all too well that what the greater public has been told about the water crisis only scratches the surface.

Posted 4 days 23 hours ago

Congressional hearings on the Flint water crisis were convened on Wednesday – but two people who should be in the hot seat weren't there. Next up, Iowa Caucus: Is this what Democracy looks like? And Obama signs the TPP.

Posted 4 days 23 hours ago
Flint water poisoning, Flint water contamination, Flint lead poisoning, water privatization, Rick Snyder, Darnell Earley

Incidences of poisoned water, not isolated to Flint, are snowballing into a colossal emblem of government's prioritization of corporate interests and profit over the basic health and human rights of citizens.

Posted 5 days 17 hours ago
Kamala Harris, Southern California Gas Co, methane leaks, Sempra Energy, Clean Power Plan, emission reductions, climate change goals

The civil suit accuses Southern California Gas of violating state health and safety laws when it failed to promptly control the release of 80,000 metric tons of methane, a far more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide.

Posted 6 days 13 hours ago

Housing costs are skyrocketing in Seattle – up 12% for a family home in the last year – and a 2012 study in the Journal of Urban Affairs showed that an increase of $100 in median rents results in a 15% increase in the homeless population.

Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, TTIP, corporate trade deals, Investment Court System, German Magistrates Association, Investor State Dispute Settlement, ISDS, Global Justice Now

The German Magistrates Association (DRB) last week dealt a major blow to the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, as judges said special courts allowing firms to sue countries were unnecessary and "had no legal basis."

Flint water poisoning, Flint water contamination, Flint lead poisoning, water privatization, Rick Snyder, Darnell Earley

Incidences of poisoned water, not isolated to Flint, are snowballing into a colossal emblem of government's prioritization of corporate interests and profit over the basic health and human rights of citizens.

By 10:20 a.m. on Thursday, up to 1,000 protesters were at the Sky City Convention Centre. Their aim? Disrupt proceedings for as long as possible, and by late morning they were succeeding in shutting down large parts of the capital.

Congressional hearings on the Flint water crisis were convened on Wednesday – but two people who should be in the hot seat weren't there. Next up, Iowa Caucus: Is this what Democracy looks like? And Obama signs the TPP.