Richmond Expands Battle for Eminent Domain To Save Homeowners From Foreclosure

Search form

Richmond Expands Battle for Eminent Domain To Save Homeowners From Foreclosure

Richmond Expands Battle for Eminent Domain To Save Homeowners From Foreclosure
Tue, 12/10/2013 - by Carolyn Said
This article originally appeared on San Francisco Chronicle

For Patti and Robert Castillo of Richmond, using eminent domain to prevent foreclosures boils down to a simple reality.

"We are living paycheck to paycheck just to pay the mortgage," Patti Castillo said. Reducing their principal through eminent domain "would help keep money in our pockets and let us stay in our house."

Their mortgage on a modest house now worth half of the $420,000 they paid for it in 2005 is among 624 home loans that the city of Richmond has threatened to seize via eminent domain in an effort to restructure them to be more affordable.

While homeowners like the Castillos welcome the idea, the banking industry loathes the idea of municipalities forcibly seizing mortgages and is vigorously fighting the effort. Last week, the American Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit against the nation's top housing regulator, seeking information on whether it's been unduly influenced by the banking industry.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency in August threatened possible legal action against localities that pursue eminent domain for mortgages, and said it might bar Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from backing new home loans in those areas.

Now the ACLU's lawsuit seeks to uncover "the nature of (the FHFA's) relationship with the financial industry," said Linda Lye, a staff attorney at the ACLU of Northern California. "Its unusual and very aggressive stance raises potential questions of governmental integrity."

An FHFA representative declined to comment.

The eminent domain plan, in which cities would forcibly acquire mortgages at discounts, then help homeowners refinance into smaller, more affordable home loans, is at heart a form of principal reduction, Lye said.

"Principal reduction is very mainstream; there have been calls for it from entities including the secretary of the Treasury," she said. "Communities like Richmond particularly interested in principal reduction are disproportionately minority. The FHFA should be treading very carefully and looking at whether its conduct has an extra impact on communities of color. The general concern is that they would be effectively red-lined."

Banks filed lawsuits in August seeking to stop Richmond from mortgage seizures, but a federal judge dismissed them as premature. Richmond is the city furthest along in pursuing eminent domain for mortgages, but remains one City Council vote short of the supermajority needed to exert that municipal authority.

However, if Richmond or another city exercises eminent domain for mortgages, banks have signaled that they will rush to court seeking an injunction. And banks may soon have other cities to fend off.

The City Council in Newark, N.J., last week unanimously voted to study eminent domain for mortgages. That followed a November move by fellow New Jersey town Irvington to conduct a similar study.

Steven Gluckstern, founder and chairman of Mortgage Resolution Partners, the private San Francisco firm that is providing funding and advice on Richmond's eminent domain quest, said MRP does not have a formal relationship with those cities but is sharing information with them about how the plan would work.

"These efforts are bubbling up from the grass roots," he said. Several other California towns, including El Monte, Baldwin Park and Pomona (all in Los Angeles County), are considering the idea, he said.

A polarizing issue

However, both financial and political pressures continue to mount. In August, Richmond failed to find buyers when it tried to refinance some municipal bonds, an unusual snub that experts said was related to its eminent domain quest. Richmond will return to market with those bonds in January, said City Manager Bill Lindsay.

"The eminent domain program doesn't affect our credit-worthiness or ability to pay debt service, but the fact that there are headlines about it makes it more expensive for us to borrow money."

The expected cost of a higher interest rate is likely to be slightly more than $1 million over the 15-year span of the bond, he said. About a quarter of that would impact the city's general fund; the rest affects various agencies.

Richmond sold $12.1 million of annual tax revenue anticipation notes, a standard way that cities get cash flow for operating expenses, on Wall Street last week. The city's financial adviser said about $13,000 in additional interest costs might have been caused by "other factors including the headline risk associated with the mortgage risk reduction program," Lindsay said.

In moves that could presage a congressional showdown, four U.S. senators last month wrote a strongly worded letter asking the administration to oppose mortgage seizures, while 10 U.S. representatives wrote letters supporting the plan.

Eminent domain for mortgages could "scare off private capital, dry up new mortgage credit, and harm investors and taxpayers," said the opposition letter from senators Pat Toomey, R-Pa., John Boozman, R-Ark., Mark Begich, D-Alaska, and Heidi Heitkamp, D-N.D. "We are prepared to pursue a legislative solution."

The support letter raised similar points as the ACLU lawsuit, saying refusal by government agencies to insure loans changed by eminent domain would constitute discrimination.

Meanwhile, for the Castillo family, staying put carries extra urgency, as their 24-year-old son, Leon, is severely autistic. Renting was difficult, with neighbors complaining about his vocal outbursts.

They can just swing the mortgage with Robert's income as a diesel mechanic and the money Patti gets from In-Home Supportive Services for caring for Leon.

After seeing five neighbors lose their homes to foreclosure in recent years, the Castillos hope the city's plan will work for them.

"If eminent domain doesn't go through, we're not going to be able to stay here," Patti Castillo said. "We already feel the stress of raising a child with special needs. Losing our house would ruin our credit, and we'd lose our down payment. It would benefit Richmond to help keep people in their homes."

Originally published by San Francisco Chronicle

Article Tabs

The new 40-page report published by Oxfam International also said the global fossil fuel sector now receives $1.9 trillion in subsidies each year.

Edward Snowden

Snowden told the audience he engaged in civil disobedience because he believes the democratic system of government is not able to work when people don’t know what their government is doing.

Large corporations are the winners and taxpayers are the losers when transparency, accountability and the public interest are sold out to for-profit firms.

The city's social justice roots are centuries old – and today Seattle is also home to more than 70 social justice organizations and more than a dozen progressive film festivals.

Coinciding with the National Day Against Police Brutality and Mass Incarceration, people in Santa Rosa, Calif., will hold a vigil and community potluck Wednesday to commemorate the teen's tragic death.

“We wanted to take action to dramatize the betrayal of the American people and show that we will resist and attempt to disrupt or at least expose pro-corruption politicians' ability to raise big money.”

Posted 6 days 17 hours ago

Drug and device makers paid doctors $380 million in speaking and consulting fees over a five-month period last year – and saw a healthy return on their investment.

Posted 5 days 16 hours ago

Florida has the highest foreclosure rate in the U.S. in the first quarter of 2014, and also has a "foreclosure king" who is now disbarred for his failure to oversee employees accused of carrying out wrongful foreclosures.

Posted 2 days 18 hours ago

As of September 19, 181 institutions and local governments and 656 individuals representing over $50 billion in assets have pledged to divest from fossil fuels.

Posted 5 days 16 hours ago

So little of our national wealth is going to feed people or provide jobs and instead, the richest Americans vastly increased their wealth this past year. But what vaulted these individuals to the top?

Posted 6 days 17 hours ago

On Sunday, hundreds of people milled around a protest site in the gentrifying, densely-populated district Mong Kok, manning aid stations and sitting in small circles on the pavement.

As of September 19, 181 institutions and local governments and 656 individuals representing over $50 billion in assets have pledged to divest from fossil fuels.

So little of our national wealth is going to feed people or provide jobs and instead, the richest Americans vastly increased their wealth this past year. But what vaulted these individuals to the top?

Survivors of the Sept. 26 violence joined Mexico City protesters in informal campus activities and rallies demanding justice for their missing classmates.

The new 40-page report published by Oxfam International also said the global fossil fuel sector now receives $1.9 trillion in subsidies each year.

Sign Up