Read

Search form

You Can’t Be Serious: Debunking The Dangerous Arguments Against Dodd-Frank

You Can’t Be Serious: Debunking The Dangerous Arguments Against Dodd-Frank
Wed, 8/30/2017 - by Sue Banks

Not content with their fruitless assault on Obamacare, one of President Obama’s two signature achievements, Republicans are now staging a similarly symbolic challenge to the other. In June, the House passed a measure that would significantly pare back the Dodd-Frank financial reforms. While it’s highly unlikely to become law, the bill promotes bogus and dangerous arguments for unregulated finance.

Passed in 2010, Dodd-Frank was Congress’s response to the 2008 financial crisis, which was a product of Wall Street excess more than the naïve homebuyers who are often blamed for it. The idea was partly to rein in the inordinate risk-taking by large financial institutions that pose a hazard to innocent bystanders. There’s a link here: When out-of-control financial systems crash and burn and the economy contracts in response, as happened in 2007-09, millions of people lose jobs. Pre-Obamacare, that meant losing your health insurance.

The assault on Dodd-Frank is being led by House Financial Services Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-Tex.), who, to no great surprise, gets much of his campaign money from the financial-services industry. The Hensarling-drafted Financial CHOICE (Creating Hope and Opportunity for Investors, Consumers and Entrepreneurs) Act, which passed the House in June, would do several big things that are in the interests of financial institutions but not of most other folks. (The Senate is considering its own version of Dodd-Frank rollback.)

Among its more critical features, the bill would:

  • Replace Dodd-Frank’s Orderly Liquidation Authority, a process for closing a failing institution without setting fire to the entire financial system);

  • Retroactively repeal the authority of the law’s Financial Stability Oversight Council to designate firms “systematically important financial institutions“ (SIFIs);

  • Repeal the Volcker Rule, which generally forbids banks from making risky bets with their own money (“proprietary trading”) while benefitting from federal deposit insurance;

  • Effectively strip the law’s Consumer Financial Protection Board (CFPB) of its authority and make its director a political appointee subject to removal at the president’s whim.

So much for regulatory independence.

Hensarling pitches the CHOICE Act with predictably populist language: "If we want strong economic growth and more freedom, we must empower Americans, not Washington bureaucrats."

This sort of mindless platitude calls for analysis. First, since when are federal employees not Americans? Second, how would non-bureaucrats prevent irresponsible SIFIs from wrecking the financial system? Third, how would removing constraints on gigantic financial institutions “empower” Americans, aside from the Americans who run large SIFIs? “Strong growth and more freedom” for whom?

Like most opponents of Dodd-Frank, Hensarling gets the logic of financial markets exactly backwards: Finance is an inherently risky enterprise involving inherently risky personality types, and Washington bureaucrats, also known as regulators, are often the only adults in the room.

There are plenty of disingenuous rationales for paring back Dodd-Frank. One is that the law has curtailed bank lending and hurt the economy. Not true, according to several analyses including this one. The latest data from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp, the chief regulator of the biggest banks, shows that they don’t seem to be suffering very much, either.

Then there’s the argument that Dodd-Frank compliance rules are hurting community banks. But that’s far from obvious. If anything is crimping bank lending, it’s the banks themselves, according to an intriguing and under-reported letter to the Senate Banking Committee from FDIC Vice Chairman Thomas Hoenig, who says that if the 10 biggest U.S. banks didn’t spend 99 percent of their net income on dividends and share buybacks – a deceptive way of boosting the banks' share price – they’d have an additional $1 trillion (equal to more than 5 percent of national output) free for lending.

Another Wall Street trope is that Dodd-Frank (indeed all regulation) creates uncertainty, which is always a problem for financial markets. But the law is a seven-year-old fact. A serious threat of repeal is what would create uncertainty. Others argue that the Volcker Rule is unnecessary because proprietary trading by banks has fallen off since the financial crisis.

Francis Creighton, head of the Wall Street lobbying group Financial Services Roundtable, told CNN earlier this year that “Prop trading is gone. We're not looking for it to come back.” That’s a bit like saying the wolves are no longer at the door, so let’s take down the fence.

There may be parts of Dodd-Frank that need revising, even repealing. But that’s mere detail. The big question has to do with the nature of financial crises, which in the absence of prudential regulation are not occasional anomalies but inevitabilities. The best-known exponent of this idea is the late economist Hyman Minsky, whose “financial instability thesis” holds that unless they’re restrained in some fashion, financial institutions necessarily make increasingly risky bets (higher returns generally require higher risk), rather like a reckless driver finding out the hard way how fast is too fast.

If an institution is big and well-connected enough, its failure, or even a rumor of failure, can generate waves of fear that shut down the financial system and wreck the real economy, where average people live. This is essentially what happened in 2008. The looser Congress makes the regulatory leash, the riskier SIFIs will be. In a relentlessly competitive realm where every firm is judged on quarterly earnings and pressured by merciless shareholders, there is little choice. As Citigroup CEO Chuck Prince put it on the eve of the 2008 flameout, “As long as the music is playing, you’ve got to get up and dance.”

Dodd-Frank, however imperfect, isn’t just about protecting average folks from reckless, predatory finance. It’s also about protecting Big Finance from itself. The House assault on the law probably won’t succeed this time around, but the propaganda behind it promotes a dangerous myth that even Alan Greenspan has renounced: that banks can regulate themselves. That idea will have consequences when memories of 2008 fade, as you can be sure they will.

 

Sign Up

Article Tabs

public banking, public banks, Bank of North Dakota, public financing, financing infrastructure, Wall Street influence, private-public investments

Private interests’ influence over banking consumes, rather than sustains, the public good.

Dodd-Frank act, Volcker Rule, bank deregulation, Wall Street lobby, proprietary trading, SEC

By revising the Volcker Rule, a centerpiece of the 2010 Dodd-Frank act, the feds are pushing financial regulation in a direction that should worry everyone.

Poor People's Campaign, protesting poverty, California protests, Moral Mondays

On Monday, the California Poor People's Campaign, calling for affordable housing and other policies to address poverty, interrupted the state Senate and forced legislators to halt the floor session.

occupy, creative activism, activism, act out, lockheed martin, STEM, military education, corporate education, coca-cola, water rights, greenwashing, SLAPP, dissent, silencing dissent, criminalizing dissent, human rights, environmental abuse, corporate

The war machine is now branching out – into early childhood education. Meanwhile, Coke's bogus greenwashing, and how corporations use courts to SLAPP down their opponents.

U.K. wealth inequality, U.K. wealth disparity, U.K. poverty, rising poverty

Shortly after the U.K. fell from being the world's fifth biggest economy, a new report shows that Britain is, in no unvarnished terms, infested with poverty.

public banking, public banks, Bank of North Dakota, public financing, financing infrastructure, Wall Street influence, private-public investments

Private interests’ influence over banking consumes, rather than sustains, the public good.

U.S. Border Patrol agents take into custody a father and son from Honduras near the U.S.-Mexico border on June 12, 2018, near Mission, Texas. The asylum seekers were then sent to a processing center for possible separation. Photo: John Moore/Getty Images

A new report confirms that Trump and his advisers had been considering the brutal policy of separating migrant children from their parents at the border for as long as they’ve been in power.

Democratic primaries, rigged primaries, Bernie Sanders, establishment Democrats, corporate Democrats, superdelegates, Democratic National Committee

If Democrats want any hope of voting Trump out, they must fix the broken primary system before the next election.

Dodd-Frank act, Volcker Rule, bank deregulation, Wall Street lobby, proprietary trading, SEC

By revising the Volcker Rule, a centerpiece of the 2010 Dodd-Frank act, the feds are pushing financial regulation in a direction that should worry everyone.

Poor People's Campaign, protesting poverty, California protests, Moral Mondays

On Monday, the California Poor People's Campaign, calling for affordable housing and other policies to address poverty, interrupted the state Senate and forced legislators to halt the floor session.

Dodd-Frank act, Volcker Rule, bank deregulation, Wall Street lobby, proprietary trading, SEC

By revising the Volcker Rule, a centerpiece of the 2010 Dodd-Frank act, the feds are pushing financial regulation in a direction that should worry everyone.

Posted 4 days 22 hours ago
public banking, public banks, Bank of North Dakota, public financing, financing infrastructure, Wall Street influence, private-public investments

Private interests’ influence over banking consumes, rather than sustains, the public good.

Posted 21 hours 56 min ago
occupy, creative activism, activism, act out, lockheed martin, STEM, military education, corporate education, coca-cola, water rights, greenwashing, SLAPP, dissent, silencing dissent, criminalizing dissent, human rights, environmental abuse, corporate

The war machine is now branching out – into early childhood education. Meanwhile, Coke's bogus greenwashing, and how corporations use courts to SLAPP down their opponents.

Posted 5 days 21 hours ago
U.K. wealth inequality, U.K. wealth disparity, U.K. poverty, rising poverty

Shortly after the U.K. fell from being the world's fifth biggest economy, a new report shows that Britain is, in no unvarnished terms, infested with poverty.

Posted 6 days 20 hours ago
net neutrality, FCC, Resolution of Disapproval, net neutrality rules, two-tiered internet, internet freedom, Congressional Review Act, net neutrality repeal, Freedom Works, Ajit Pai

"Any lawmaker, of any party, that fails to sign the discharge petition in support of the CRA will regret it come election time."

Posted 6 days 20 hours ago
Poor People's Campaign, protesting poverty, California protests, Moral Mondays

On Monday, the California Poor People's Campaign, calling for affordable housing and other policies to address poverty, interrupted the state Senate and forced legislators to halt the floor session.

voter ID laws, disenfranchisement, Supreme Court, National Voter Registration Act, ACLU

Large numbers of voters—largely low income and minorities—could be blocked from casting ballots in November if they haven't participated in recent elections.

net neutrality, FCC, Resolution of Disapproval, net neutrality rules, two-tiered internet, internet freedom, Congressional Review Act, net neutrality repeal, Freedom Works, Ajit Pai

"Any lawmaker, of any party, that fails to sign the discharge petition in support of the CRA will regret it come election time."

Democratic primaries, rigged primaries, Bernie Sanders, establishment Democrats, corporate Democrats, superdelegates, Democratic National Committee

If Democrats want any hope of voting Trump out, they must fix the broken primary system before the next election.

occupy, creative activism, activism, act out, lockheed martin, STEM, military education, corporate education, coca-cola, water rights, greenwashing, SLAPP, dissent, silencing dissent, criminalizing dissent, human rights, environmental abuse, corporate

The war machine is now branching out – into early childhood education. Meanwhile, Coke's bogus greenwashing, and how corporations use courts to SLAPP down their opponents.